Minggu, 25 Desember 2016

THE METHODOLOGY OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ISLAMIC AND WESTERN VERSION (the other version)



THE METHODOLOGY OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
ISLAMIC AND WESTERN VERSION
PAPERS
on subjects of science and Religion
Lecturer                       :Prof. Dr. Mulyadi Kartanegara


logo_uin - Copy

By                   : Via Elga Susilawati
11140331000008


AQIDA AND ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY
FACULTY OF USHULUDDIN
STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY
SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA
2016




CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION

The method of science is dotted-decline of the question ‘how do I get scientific knowledge?’. Scientific means knowing knowledge as it is. For example the small stars at the blue sky. Of course we know that it is not small and when there is a star no matter the sky is not blue. If a scientific talk, then that's not scientific, because our knowledge of the star is not yet as it is still a sensory impression or alone. To attain the knowledge of things as they are, then scientific methodology becomes important. Because with this methodology, then we will be able to achieve the objective knowledge. Therefore the scientists keep looking to gain knowledge.
Scientific methodology that will lead us to a more true knowledge, and scientific. If we're talking the scientific method in the field of science, it is there then they only restrict the scientific method it on one method or also called observation experiments. In Arabic it is called tajribi. This means that based on experience. Words related to tajribi is mujarrab means tested. In the West, Because the science was restricted in the areas of physical, so the scientific objects in the Western world was that physical. Because they do not believe in the non physical. Secular does not believe in view of look that can not be in the senses or verification through observations of the senses. For modern science, metaphysical things, it does not go into scientific fields. Even on the lately, psychology is directed at the inhabitants. But according to modern science, if the soul could not be observed, then it is not included. So according to them, that the observed tentng soul is human attitude. Then came the two named Psychology (behavior science).
Meanwhile, according to Mohammed Abed al-Jabiri, the methods of science in Islam can be obtained by 3 ways: (1) the method of Bayani, (2) methods of Burhani, (3) method of Irfani. This paper is intended to describe the third method.


CHAPTER II
DISCUSSION

A.    The Meaning and the Relationship of Science and Religion
Religion according to the great dictionary of the language of Indonesia (KBBI), is a system that regulates the grammar of faith and personality of God as well as the grammar rule that is associated with the Association of man and his environment. Human habitation where humans can find meaning and essence of life. While science is something that can parse and explains the uniqueness of the universe include physics, chemistry, geology, Botany, zoology, and others.
Though between the two play an important role in human life, does not mean the relationship runs harmoniously without any problems. Science and religion often become heated debate among the scientists and theologian. Science claims that religion can not touch the realm of science. Any religion says that science is just a thought that there is no puasnya to examine what is in this world but are already described in the Scriptures of their respective faiths. Eventually these fundamentals of thought raises a ruckus between science and religion. Both are said to be unable to unite.
Science and religion in two conflicting extremes. That science and religion provide the opposite statement so people have to choose one among the two. Each spool adherents by taking positions that are bersebrangan. Science negated the existence of religion, nor vice versa. Both are just recognizing the validity of the existence of each.
Its conflict of Galileo and the Catholic Church, for example, the center of the universe in question occurred on the first and second dimension and actually there is also a political element that is found there.
An example of a case in relation to this conflict is a penalty given by the Catholic Church against Galileo over aspects of his thinking about the theory of Copernicus, i.e. the Earth and planets revolve in orbits around the Sun, but the authority of the Church believes the Earth as the center of the universe. Therefore so then Galileo was tried in 1633. An example of the tension at the same time signify transmission point between science and religion means that at the point of transmission that we can also talk about the possibility of integrating the two.
While on the other hand, the part of the scientists assume that the scientific method is the only source of knowledge that can be trusted and understood. Adherents of this doctrine tends to impose the authority of science into fields outside of science. As for religion, for part of the circle of Western scientists are considered subjective, closed and very difficult to change. Beliefs of religion is also not acceptable because it is not public data can be tested by experiment and criteria as well as science.
There are some statements that assert that science contradicts religion and can't possibly put together. However, Einstein in his book stating that he never considered the relationship between science and religion as an antithesis. Instead he looked at the science and religion are two things that are complementary or interdependent of each other. A relationship as reflected in metaforanya: "science without religion lame, religion without science is blind".
Religion is born as a guide and a guide to human life. Religion is born not with ratios, research, and testing of sheer but born after the creation of the essence that is beyond the reach of human reason and research on certain objects. Religion becomes the end point of a long journey of man in search of life satisfaction that cannot be obtained in philosophy and science.
Also the science, he was born of admiration the failasuf seeking answer to the sense of satisfaction penasarannya. Science equip it with things that are not only set out the logic. Science has begun to explore the realm of more practical and logical acquired in various ways which are quite systematic. Yet people still can't calm and happy just by armed with science in her life.
B.     The Scientific Methodology
The method of science is dotted-decline of the question how do I get scientific knowledge?. In scientific knowledge or gain can be accountable kebenaranya there are several methods or ways to obtain a knowledge of the original, the word derives from the Arabic word scientific but usually scholars understand it in the sense of "scientific" so that the word of scientific methods is understood in the sense of "scientific methods" yet here there is a difference of scientific methods with scientific method because in scientific usually only limited empirical fields in islam, said islam is not just limited to physical bidng but also but also in fields such as mathematics and non empirical metaphysics and its object properties because it is essentially different from that of empirical science demanded different methods.
According To Prof. Dr. Mujamil Qomar, M.Ag. Epistemology in his book, Islamic education, there are several terms for mentioning the word ' science ' al-' ilm, and science. In Islamic contexts, looking at that science does not produce absolute truth. The right to define the term knowledge is used the word al-' ilm for possession of absolute truth and can be accounted for. Source: al-' ilm is derived from revelation or the Qur'an, all of them valid. Then according to Islamic sources from al-' ilm has a jayyid isnaad that more powerful than the Western version of science because it rests directly to God Almighty.
Furthermore Perter r. Senn posited, "method is a procedure or way of knowing things, that have a systematic steps." While the methodology is a study in learning rule-peaturan method. In a simple methodology is the science of the study of the methods or procedures or ways of knowing things.
Thus, it must be realized that the methodology is a very important issue in the history of the growth of knowledge. History proves that all sciences grows through the methodology of both the science of sociology, economics, anthropology and so on. The methodology has a mission to solve the issues raised on the basis of the new findings, to the accumulation of knowledge, both regarding the "natural world" as well as "social world". Methodology always find new findings to realize the dynamics of science. These new findings reported and communicated so that open for known and tested by anyone.
1.      The Tajribi Method
Tajribi experimental means used as scientific method to examine the empirical fields so including didalamya methods of observation. Observation is an activity that is done against a process of intelligent beings or objects in order to feel and then grasp the knowledge of a phenomenon based on knowledge and ideas that were already known before, to get the information needed to continue a research. The science of biology and astronomy have a basic history of observations by amateurs. In the study, observation can be done with the test, questionnaire, recording images and sound recordings.
In fact this method already used in the early days of the Islamic scientific resurrection i.e. ninth century ten. This method is very important given the observation of objects through the senses is not always accurate because there is a shortage of intrinsic tools against our senses then needed observations. As an example of the shortcomings of human sensory tools: the eye can not see the dierinya itself, the eye cannot see things far away terlal danhal that is too close, the eye cannot see things that exist behind the curtain while the intellect could, the eye can only see things that are born but resourceful bis see rational entities in addition to the objects of the senses.
Given the many shortcomings in our sensory tools, how can we gain the knowledge that is required then an original method used to observe objects that ditelitinya there are two methods contained in the Islamic tradition that is performed on a physical object, i.e. the theoretical level where Islamic scientists examine carefully and critically scientific papers from a particular physics missal astronomy, medicine. The next practical level and where Muslim scholars do various experiments to membuktikana or reject theory for example about the vision that eventually they can infer even find new methods.
After the muslim scientists get new methods and get the accurate and objective against an object to get the subjective errors of an observer later muslim scientists then continued and developed by scientists-the Western scientists to a greater extent so sophisticated such as making more sophisticated measurements such as distance i.e. the metre, kilometre dsn burdens such as kilogram, pound, punch then munculah size units.
In addition to creating the measuring instrument scientists also created tools to make something small and not visible to the eye like a microscope, the method tajribi should also follow the procedure for the taking of the verdict or conclusion for pengamatnya it's good nature is nothing can or deductive inference and retrieval of general principles to specific or deductive i.e. Drawing conclusions from the particular objects.
2.      The Bayani Method
Etymologically, the term bayani contains various meanings including: continuity (al-waslu), keterpilahan (al-fashlu), clear and light (al-wudlhuh wa al-Dhuhr), and the ability to make light and generic. As an episteme, clarity to manifest itself last in al-bayan al- ‘ibarat “perspective” and "method" that largely determine the pattern of thought not only within the scope of "semi-democracy"-aesthetic, but also within the scope of "logic-discursive". In other words, bayan became a terminology in addition to include the meaning of everything that completes the action understanding.
Bayani is a typical Arab thinking method emphasizes the authority of the text (nash), directly or indirectly, and the linguistic sense by dijustifikasi dug through inference (istidlal). Directly means the knowledge test as mamahami so and directly apply without thinking. Indirectly means understanding the text as raw knowledge so need the interpretation and reasoning. However, this does not mean the sense or meaning of the babas can determine the ratio and significance, but should rely on the text. In bayani, the ratio diangggap is not able to provide a knowledge except resting on the text. In a religious perspective, the goal is the esoteric aspects of bayani viewfinder (Shari'ah).
Thus, the source of knowledge is bayani text (nash). In Usul Fiqh is nash as a source of knowledge bayani is the quran and Hadith. Therefore, the bayani epistemology take great care and meticulous process of transmitting the text of the kegenerasi generation. It's important to bayani, because the validity of the transmission of the text to determine the true harm provisions of law were taken. If the transmission of the text could mean that text is right justified and can be used as the legal basis. Conversely, if the transmission is in doubt, the truth of the text could not be used as legal basis.
3.      The Burhani or Logic Method
The object of knowledge in islam is not only restricted to physical things but also the non physical. But we know that our senses have shortcomings in knowing the non physical objects, then we need to find out other tools. The tool in question is the aql in the tradition of islam, since the intellect is able to know many things that cannot be done by the senses, as for some examples of excess of sense: sense can see in that sense can understand not just the objects that others but himself he could mempersepsi himself as knowing and powerful he can see his knowledge with him.
Both eyes couldn't see too far and too close while sense can see it because of the far and near there is no problem on the sense in a moment of sense can figure out that there is a high and at the sky in a moment of sense can come down and down the Earth's core, while the eye can see there is something behind the closed cadat or something but common sense can easily move into ' arsy located behind hijb-ceiling , and while the intellect can only see sense then that is born can feel whose groans as love, sorrow, inner problems, soul, and spirit.
Burhan in language is a strong and clear argumentation. In terms of logic, al-burhan is intellectual activities to prove the truth of a proposition through deduction by way of connecting the proposition that one who has proven an axiomatic basis. Thus, burhan is an intellectual activity to assign a particular proposition.
To get knowledge, epistemology burhani using rules of syllogism. Syllogism in Arabic, translated by al-Jam'i al-qiyas refers to the meaning of ashal, collect.
Reason burhani hold on power of natural human form of senses and the authority of reason in gaining knowledge. Thus Agus burhan, Najib said in the sense of having roles and functions that are most important. Therefore using the premises consistent logic, common sense trying to find knowledge of realities (al-waqi '), both the reality of nature, social, religious or humanities.
4.      The Irfani Method
After using the tajribi method of the senses and it turns out that we still need tools and other methods to the perfection of the human sciences because regardless of how excess makes sense there is still batasanya and many great things that cannot be solved with common sense. In the scientific tradition of islam, in addition to the senses and the intellect's knowledge there is still one more muslim scientists recognized i.e. heart (qalb) or in philosophy is called intuition, difference of knowledge obtained by reason and intuition as to know and experience because it's always rational knowledge are indirect because for the Bundesliga knowing things he needs intermediaries. Using this knowledge by way of purging liver first this is what distinguishes the introduction of intuition with the introduction of the senses, this intuitis knowledge then known with the usual irfani method used by Sufis.
In addition to the logic of seeking knowledge can also be used by using of hearts, which is so special so as will constitute a separate kind of intuitive knowledge actually, i.e. it remains contained in human rationality in general but dilawankan with the knowledge of rationality to the extent it thus emphasizes systematic and methodical, the two forces that sense according to basic biotiknya globally but not exclusive allocated in two sides of the human brain is primarily a source in language proficiency for understanding the feelings of others , for fantasy, for feeling. While the right side is more into sumberbagi spatial activities, for mathematical calculations, for the logic straight, for it is commonly called the activities of rationality. However, the Division of tasks was not exclusive because the other side participated actively.
That is, Irfani is a model methodology is based on the approach and the direct experience of the spiritual reality of the top religious. In contrast to the nonprofit eksoteris bayani target, target shoot ' irfani is part esoteric (batin) text, therefore, ratio acts as a tool to explain a variety of spiritual experience. In terminology, irfani is release of knowledge gained through nature shines by the Lord to his servant (al-kasyf) after the riyadlah.
Concrete examples of the approach ' is a philosophical isyraqi irfani regarding knowledge of discursive (al-hikmah al-batiniyyah) must be creatively combined harmoniously with intuitive knowledge (al-hikmah al-zawqiyah). With the design knowledge gained into knowledge that is enlightening, it will even reach the al-hikmah al-haqiqiyyah. The inner experience of the Prophet. in receiving the revelation of the Qur'an is a concrete example of knowledge irfani.
Irfan is knowledge gained by olah spiritually where with purity of heart, hopefully God will bestow knowledge directly to him. From there, then dikonsepsikan or come into mind before expressed to others. Thus, in methodology, at least spiritually knowledge gained through three phases namely preparation, receipt and disclosure, with either oral or written.
The first phase, preparation. In order to receive a wealth of knowledge, one usually must complete a level-level of spiritual life.
1.      Repentance
2.      Wara '
3.      The ascetic
4.      Poor
5.      Be patient
6.      the Tawakkal
7.      The pleasure
Second, the stage of acceptance. If you've reached a certain level in Sufism, someone will get plenty of direct knowledge of God on iluminatif.
Third, disclosure. This is the last stage of the process of the attainment of knowledge ' irfani, where mystical experience interpreted and expressed to others through speech or writing.
Like the Sufis, these stages are the maqamat, which will deliver them on ma'rifatullah in bathiniyah. It is not wrong if al-Hallaj said ana al-khaq hulul, because he has knowledge of hulul, kaysf that can only be felt by anyone who has ever felt. Reasonable minds can never reach it.


Bibliography
Abed Muhammad al-Jabiri, Bunyah al- ‘Aql al- ‘Arabi, Beirut, al-Markaz al-Tsaqafi al-Arabi, 1991)
Agus Muhammad Najib, “Nalar Burhani Dalam Hukum Islam (Sebuah Penelusuran Awal)”, Hermenia : Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, Vol.2. No.2 (Juli-Desember 2003)
Al-Qusairi mencatat ada empat puluh sembilan tahapan yang harus dilalui, sedang at-Thabthabai mencatat dua puluh empat jenjang, lihat Simuh, Tasawuf dan Perkembangannya Dalam Islam, (Jakarta : Rajawali Press, 1977)
Arif Mahmud, “Pertautan Epistemologi Bayani dan Pendidikan Islam”, Al-Jami’ah Vol. 40, No. 1 (Januari-Juni 2002)
Bakker Anton dan Achmad Charris Zubair, Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat, (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1990)
Ian G. Barbour, Juru Bicara Tuhan, Antara Sains dan Agama, Terj. E.R. Muhammad, (Bandung: Mizan, 2002)
John F. Haught, Perjumpaan Sains dan Agama; dari Konflik ke Dialog, (Bandung: Mizan, 2004)
Kartanagara Mulyadi, Reaktualisasi Tradisi Ilmiah Islam (Jakarta: Baitul Ihsan, 2006)
Kartanegara Mulyadhi, Menyibak Tirai Kejahilan, Pengantar Epistemologi Islam (Cet. I; Bandung: Mizan, 2003)
Khodori Achmad Soleh, “M. Abid al-Jabiri : Model Epistemologi Islam dalam Pemikiran Islam Kontemporer”, (Yogyakarta : Jendela, 2003)
Qomar Mujamil, Epistemologi Pendidikan Islam dari Metode Rasional hingga Metode Kritik, (Jakarta: ERLANGGA, 2005)


0 komentar:

Posting Komentar